Criterion
|
Incomplete
(0)
|
Beginning
(1 – 2)
|
Developing
(3 – 5)
|
Proficient
(6 – 7)
|
Advanced
(8 - 9)
|
Exceptional (10)
|
Focus: Thesis, Intro, Concl.
|
Specific
topic is unclear and no statement of an opinion or a stand.
No
introduction
No
conclusion
|
Specific
topic is clear but no statement of an opinion or a stand.
Brief
introduction that doesn’t state the topic or subtopics
Brief
conclusion; abrupt ending
|
Thesis
statement expresses the topic but not an opinion or a stand.
Weak
introduction that states the topic but is missing a clear thesis. The focus
of the paper is unclear.
Conclusion
does not fully summarize the main points nor restates the thesis statement.
|
Thesis
statement includes the topic and expresses a stand or opinion.
Introduction
states topic and thesis and gives direction to the paper.
Conclusion
reiterates main points and restates the thesis statement.
|
Clearly-stated
topic and thoughtful thesis statement.
Strong
introduction with a thesis statement that grabs attention and directs the
course of the essay.
Strong
conclusion that summarizes the main points and restates the thesis
statement. Satisfactorily wraps up the
essay.
|
Clearly-stated,
thought-provoking topic and compelling thesis statement.
Excellent
introduction with a thesis statement that grabs attention and directs the
course of the essay.
Excellent
conclusion that summarizes the main points and restates the thesis
statement. Skillfully wraps up the
essay.
|
Content
|
Contains
mostly unrelated information
No
specific details, only generalities.
|
No
major points to support the thesis are included.
No
details related to the topic have been used; ideas are disconnected.
|
Some
of the major points are covered.
Some
specific details are included. Lacks sufficient material to fully support
thesis.
|
Many
of the major points are covered.
Many
of the appropriate details are included with each point.
|
All
major points are discussed.
All
points include some details.
|
All
major points are thoroughly and insightfully discussed.
All
points are fully supported with strong details.
|
Organization
|
Ideas
are arranged randomly. There may be no
division of paragraphs.
|
Ideas
are slightly random with occasional orderly sections. Inconsistent division of paragraphs.
|
Like
ideas are grouped together, and paragraphs are present, but ideas within may
not be organized logically.
Transitions
may be lacking.
|
An
apparent progression of ideas that allows the reader to move through the text
without confusion.
Sentences
with paragraphs are organized and flow smoothly
|
A
coherent progression of ideas that allows the reader to move through the text
without confusion.
Sentences
within paragraphs flow smoothly with good use of transitions.
|
Expresses
a clear, logical sequence of ideas within paragraphs and throughout the
paper.
Sentences
within paragraphs flow effortlessly with excellent use of transitions.
|
Mechanics
|
Numerous
errors; meaning of paper unclear
|
Frequent
errors, seriously impairs flow & meaning of paper
|
Errors
noticeable and occasionally detract from flow or meaning of paper
|
Some
errors that are minor in nature and don’t detract from overall meaning of
paper
|
Very
few errors that are minor in nature and don’t detract from overall meaning of
paper
|
Essentially
faultless; errors may result from risk-taking and do not detract from the
paper
|
Total Score – 40 possible
points
No comments:
Post a Comment